Nov. 13th, 2007

map_of_the_world: (Default)
So I'm having a long convoluted email conversation with a couple of people about a lot of different bits and pieces and one of them said

I also have issues about the word “rape”, I find it horribly objectifying since it refers to devaluing of property rather than assault,

And I kind of get where shes coming from but I think I disagree, I mean yes when It became a crime to have sex with a woman by force that was because it was seen as a crime of theft that something was being stolen from a father or a husband but language changes and society changes and i think on several levels not using the word rape would be problematic

firstly I do think rape is a kind of theft but theft from the woman, theft of her sense of bodily integrity, of her trust in the world, of her assumption that she is safe, of her peace of mind, and often of her mental wellness. Many women also experience rape as the actual theft of the body, they become detached from their bodies, think of it as something that no longer belongs to them.

But also according to The online etymology dictionary the word rape derives from c.1386, "seize prey, take by force," from Anglo-Fr. raper, O.Fr. raper "to seize, abduct," a legal term, from L. rapere "seize, carry off by force, abduct" which isn't really the same thing as theft, it suggests kidnap more than steal I would say.

Also what word do we use if we don't use rape? I don't think the term "sexual assault " cuts it really because people do not think of forced penetrative sex when that term is used I don't think. And I do think being raped is worse that being other wise sexually assaulted.

Also for many women who have been raped the word itself is incredibly powerful and difficult to say, difficult to claim as an experience and when they can say the word "rape" or say "I was aped" or say "he raped me" that is often the point that healing can begin.
map_of_the_world: (Default)
I try to stay away from things that are strongly americentric because I really resent the fact that north America as seen as the default position and other places are either not thought about or are tacked on as an unimportant footnote/afterthought but unfortunately American politics does effect the rest of the world and unfortunately for me the people in my government are U.S. government lackeys so:

Ron Paul is a very very scary person and hes running for US president

hes anti imigration and anti refugees

Hes anti welfare

Hes anti-choice

wait did we just get him on all three strikes why yes we did, hes racist classist and misogynistic! And what do you bet we can add homophobia to that little list as well?

but that's not all folks! oh no

hes also anti gun control

To be fair he was anti the war in Iraq but not because it was fundamentally wrong and imperialistic but because it was damaging for America.

Please dont vote for him and ask your friends not to also

Profile

map_of_the_world: (Default)
map_of_the_world

October 2010

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 11th, 2025 11:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios